Payday Lender Settles After FTC Files Action
Apply for a Loan
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Sep 21, 2011
Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident loan decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one loan provider and cannot guarantee quotes from any single provider. Our partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different companies please enter your ZIP code on this page to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about loans. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything loan related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
September 21, 2011 – One scam that many payday lenders use to target consumers is by illegally requiring employers to take money out of the borrower’s wages to pay back the loan. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) seeks to end this activity by frequently charging these companies in court.
One such case occurred near the beginning of the month against South Dakota lender Padyday Financial, LLC, which operates Big Sky Cash and Lakota Cash. This company sells short-term, high interest, unsecured payday loans of between $300 and $2,525 throughout the U.S. It was charged with allegedly illegally garnishing consumer wages when they failed to pay the balance on a payday loan with the company.
Garnishing wages, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, is when “an employer is required to withhold the earnings of an individual for the payment of a debt in accordance with a court order or other legal or equitable procedure.” Private companies like payday loan stores need a court order, while government agencies do not.
The FTC’s case states that Payday Financial, LLC, sent documents that were similar to those used by federal agencies to ask employers to take these funds out of borrowers’ paychecks when they failed to repay their loans.
According to a press release from the FTC, “the complaint further alleges that the defendants have violated the FTC’s Credit Practices Rule by requiring consumers taking out payday loans to consent to have wages taken directly out of their paychecks in the event of a default, and have violated the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E by requiring authorization for electronic payments from their bank account as a condition of obtaining payday loans.”
This is not the first of such charges levied by the FTC. For example, in September of last year it accused Ecash and GeteCash and the defendants settled in the case.