FDIC and CFPB Review Payday Lending Banks
Apply for a Loan
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Nov 6, 2012
Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident loan decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one loan provider and cannot guarantee quotes from any single provider. Our partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different companies please enter your ZIP code on this page to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about loans. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything loan related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Two U.S. agencies are scrutinizing payday loan-like products being offered by major banks. Currently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the recently created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) are reviewing the payday loans.
FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg responded to a request for the bank investigations and said he would make it a priority to investigate these banks.
Even individuals are stepping forward. North Carolina’s state attorney general, Roy Cooper, is researching if the products deceive consumers into taking out potentially illegal loans. In September, Cooper condemned Regions Bank for advertising the products in his home state. He forced the bank to reveal details of the loan in order to investigate if it is breaking state anti-payday-lending laws.
Some banks remain solid in their determination to keep the payday loans. Jeffrey Lee, Regions’ executive vice president, responded to Cooper’s investigations in a letter to state officials. He said the loans “create a credit record that will enable [borrowers] to graduate to more mainstream credit products, whether with us or with another reputable institution.”
In Lee’s opinion, the loan options have been received positively by their customers.
The payday-like loans have been added to a few banks across the country, including Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp and Regions Financial. A majority of them started in the past three years, since a 2010 Federal Reserve ruling limited debit-card swipe fees among other items. In order to maintain similar levels of revenue, banks expanded their loan options. The banks are now marketing towards a different kind of customer than they normally would serve: one that needs cash quickly and is willing to accept a high interest rate.
In the original format of payday loans, a borrower would apply in-store for a loan. In order to access the money, borrowers were required to provide a check postdated for their next payday. Newer online versions require banking information in order to have direct debiting. The new “banking loans,” which are referred to by a variety of names, such as Wells Fargo’s “Direct Deposit Advance,” state they offer lower interest rates than traditional payday loans. The banks still access the money in similar, direct repayment forms.
The CFPB reports that payday loans carry annual rates as high as 521 percent. According to the Center for Responsible Lending in North Carolina, payday loan customers pay, on average, 365 percent in annual interest rates. Annually, the average customer gets 16 loans and spends over six months in debt. The borrowers find it difficult to repay the initial loan, plus the added cost of fees and interest.
Reports of misuse are even moving towards the federal court system. In August, two customers sued Fifth Third Bank stating that their loans violated both state and federal interest rate laws and deceived customers about the true cost of the payday loans. The lawsuit stated the cost of the loans is “particularly unwarranted.”