Sara Routhier, Managing Editor of Features and Outreach, has professional experience as an educator, SEO specialist, and content marketer. She has over five years of experience in the insurance industry. As a researcher, data nerd, writer, and editor she strives to curate educational, enlightening articles that provide you with the must-know facts and best-kept secrets within the overwhelming worl...

Full Bio →

Written by

Joel Ohman is the CEO of a private equity-backed digital media company. He is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, author, angel investor, and serial entrepreneur who loves creating new things, whether books or businesses. He has also previously served as the founder and resident CFP® of a national insurance agency, Real Time Health Quotes. He also has an MBA from the University of South Florida. ...

Full Bio →

Reviewed by Joel Ohman
Founder, CFP®

UPDATED: Oct 8, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident loan decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one loan provider and cannot guarantee quotes from any single provider. Our partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different companies please enter your ZIP code on this page to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about loans. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything loan related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

David Han from Tujunga, California was sentenced on the morning of Oct. 2 to 37 months in federal prison for participating in a fraudulent home loan scheme that resulted in losses of over $1 million.

At sentencing, United States District Judge Manuel L. Real ordered Han to pay $1,065,000 in restitution.

Back in May, Han pled guilty to four counts of bank fraud based on the submission of home financing applications to four different banks. The home loan applications were submitted under the false alias of “Young He Kim.” Additionally, the home financing applications were all secured by the same property.

In the lending process, property is often given over as collateral in order to secure money to purchase a home. In the event of a default, the lender—in this case, all four banks—can repossess the property.

But Han deceptively submitted all of the applications at the same time in a “shotgun” method. Doing so allowed him to obtain both approval and funding from each bank before any of the banks recorded liens on the same property.

On top of these crimes and abuses, Han falsely represented information on his home financing application concerning his employer, employment status and the amount of his income.

Once Han had received the loans, he deposited the money into bank accounts that had been created under the name of his alias “Young He Kim.” Han then proceeded to purchase cashier checks in order to withdraw his illegally obtained funds.

After obtaining more than $700,000 in home financing proceeds, Han sent counterfeit checks to the banks as partial loan-repayments. This prompted the banks to send additional funds to Han. Repeating this process allowed Han to obtain an additional $300,000 before the victimized banks finally realized that the checks were counterfeit.

The FBI pursued and caught Han after conducting an investigation of the checks.